[fvc-wat-disc] All-candidates debate mishap

ARI DAIGEN adaigen at sympatico.ca
Fri Sep 28 08:41:30 EDT 2007


I'd be happy to. I'll call her right now if you think that's a good idea--or 
do you think we should *meet*?

Ari

>From: "Angela Yenssen" <ayenssen at rogers.com>
>Reply-To: FVC Waterloo Region Discussion 
><fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org>
>To: "'FVC Waterloo Region Discussion'" <fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org>
>Subject: RE: [fvc-wat-disc] All-candidates debate mishap
>Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:38:25 -0400
>
>I like Ari's idea of attempting to contact Louise Ervin to correct her
>misunderstanding of the system.  Is anyone interested in taking on this
>task?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: fvc-wat-disc-bounces at listserv.thinkers.org
>[mailto:fvc-wat-disc-bounces at listserv.thinkers.org] On Behalf Of Paul 
>Nijjar
>Sent: September 27, 2007 10:37 PM
>To: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>Subject: [fvc-wat-disc] All-candidates debate mishap
>
>
>So I went down to Grey Silo golf course (!?) tonight to attend the
>K-W all-candidates meeting and put out our literature. We were *not*
>permitted to put out literature on the literature table. I was given
>the reason that it was "not neutral" and that they would accept only
>neutral (i.e. Referendum Ontario) material there. (Because, you know,
>it's a debate. There's no place for partisan material at an
>ALL-CANDIDATES MEETING.)
>
>To add insult to injury, they *confiscated* the black OCA books that
>another candidate (Judy Greenwood-Speers) had included with her other
>campaign literature. Those were not our OCA books. Judy had ordered
>them for her own campaign.
>
>In other news, Liberal candidate Louise Ervin said that she had
>carefully studied the proposal and did not like it because the 30
>(sic) list MPPs would be appointed and not elected, and because the
>number of elected (i.e. riding) MPPs would go down to 90. That's
>right. A candidate for our riding studied the proposal so thoroughly
>that she did not get the number of seats correct. (That's not a slam
>against the Liberals. It's a slam against the level of education
>around this issue, which the Record is doing its best to stymie.)
>
>If you don't believe me about the referendum literature confiscation,
>ask Adam Glauser.
>
>If you don't believe me about Ervin, watch the debate (which the
>Record may publish online).
>
>I don't know what to do about this. I am thoroughly frustrated.
>
>- Paul
>
>
>--
>Paul Nijjar  http://www.fairvotecanada.org/WaterlooRegion
>Next Referendum Info Session: Sept 18, 7pm
>(Please use this Yahoo! account for future correspondence.)
>
>
>       Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk 
>email
>the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at
>http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
>
>_______________________________________________
>fvc-wat-disc mailing list
>fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>fvc-wat-disc mailing list
>fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc




More information about the fvc-wat-disc mailing list