[fvc-wat-disc] Elizabeth's question and Justin's answer

Shayne Sangster shayne_sangster at hotmail.com
Sun Jun 5 15:16:40 EDT 2016


But the Liberal election promise was that the 2015 election would be the last under first past the post. This better not be a case of one-up-manship by Mr. Trudeau like some of the other election promises he made.

Any talk of amending the Referendum Act, which currently only allows referendums on the constitution?

Shayne Sangster


Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Koodo network.
From: daviddirks at rogers.com
Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2016 2:50 PM
To: FVC Waterloo Region Discussion
Reply To: daviddirks at rogers.com
Subject: Re: [fvc-wat-disc] Elizabeth's question and Justin's answer


My impression from Monsef's interview on the House this weekend: if the Liberals hear a clear message from people that FPTP is their preference, the Liberals may retain it.  It was a pretty weak/unclear response to Hall's question.

David


On Saturday, June 4, 2016 7:46 AM, Jon Bathmaker <jon.bathmaker at gmail.com> wrote:


Weeell, I agree with Bob that it's not much of an answer to EM's
question and it's a pretty hopeful answer, unless he thinks that AV
isn't FPTP in which case all bets are off.

Jon

On 6/3/2016 10:54 PM, Bob Jonkman wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> For those who use secure browsers and see only a blank page at either
> of those URLs, here's a direct link to the YouTube video:
>
> https://youtu.be/C-axhmxfZLs
>
> Interesting that Mr. Trudeau doesn't actually answer Ms. May's
> question: "I want to ask the Prime Minister if he agrees with me that
> our friends in the Conservative Party are not interested in a
> referendum or they would have looked at the Act; they're interested in
> stopping Canadians from getting what we voted for as a majority for a
> fair voting system" (which isn't much of question); instead he says
> that "the next election will not be done under First Past The Post"
> (which isn't much of an answer).
>
> - --Bob.
>
>
> On 2016-06-03 09:05 PM, Anita Nickerson wrote:
>> Thanks, Sharon!
>>
>> Anita
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Sharon Sommerville <
>> sharonsommerville at gmail.com<mailto:sharonsommerville at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> If the link won't open, try this:
>>>
>>> http://elizabethmaymp.ca/qp-electoral-reform/
>>>
>>> Sharon
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Sharon Sommerville <
>>> sharonsommerville at gmail.com<mailto:sharonsommerville at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> This is taken from Elizabeth May's parliamentary week in
>>>> review. Elizabeth's question is very reveling as is Justin's
>>>> answer. His answer refutes Minister Monsef recent comments that
>>>> if Cdns. want to keep FPTP, there will be no change to our
>>>> electoral system.
>>>>
>>>> Is a referendum even an option for electoral reform?
>>>> <http://contacts.elizabethmaymp.ca/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u=103022&qid=18744969>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> Regards,
>>>> Sharon Waterloo Region
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ This is the
>>> fvc-wat-disc mailing list Post a message:
>>> fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org<mailto:fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org> Unsubscribe:
>>> http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ This is the
>> fvc-wat-disc mailing list Post a message:
>> fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org<mailto:fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org> Unsubscribe:
>> http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
> Comment: Ensure confidentiality, authenticity, non-repudiability
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAldSQuEACgkQuRKJsNLM5eqENgCeK0ejHNl83xGw2qeAfu3o91mt
> fAEAoPcFXHnIi6ntUDNepmKwPCaWZ6XO
> =u0jE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
> Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org<mailto:fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org>
> Unsubscribe: http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
>
>



_______________________________________________
This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org<mailto:fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org>
Unsubscribe: http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.thinkers.org/pipermail/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org/attachments/20160605/e77d301d/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the fvc-wat-disc mailing list