[fvc-wat-disc] Invite Bob Hepburn to talk?
Catherine Campbell
cdcampbell9 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 18 01:17:54 EDT 2018
Excellent letter, Dave
> On Jun 17, 2018, at 10:35 PM, Sharon Sommerville <sharonsommerville at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Dave, it is very good. Hope that the Star prints it, you could also send it to The Record.
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 10:23 PM, Dave Arthur <arthurd23 at bell.net> wrote:
>> I sent out this letter to The Star earlier today for comments but maybe sent it to the wrong group address.
>>
>> Let me know your thoughts.
>>
>> I know it’s over the 150 word limit but couldn’t pare it down any more.
>>
>> Maybe they’ll let it go.
>>
>> Dave A
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> More misinformation against electoral reform.
>>
>> Chrystia Freeland says “Facts and truth matter.” Bob Hepburn’s column ‘Rejecting the siren call for electoral reform’ rejects both.
>>
>> Hepburn points to five risks, all as distorted as the election results under our current system.
>>
>> First, minority governments have served Canada well and tiny parties do not get enough votes to meet the threshold required in most of the 90% of developed democracies using proportional systems. Pointing to atypical countries like Israel and Italy is misleading.
>>
>> Second, Canada has one of the lowest voter turnouts in the world while most countries using PR where all votes count and strategic voting is not a factor have significantly higher voter turnouts.
>>
>> Third, extreme right-wing parties are unlikely to gain oversized influence. Research shows governments elected under PR systems have more cooperation, consensus, and better long-range planning.
>>
>> Fourth, PR systems, including MMP, have various methods of awarding, not appointing, MMPs that can give voters more choice, more representation, and better balance of urban and rural interests.
>>
>> Fifth, B.C.’s 2005 referendum approved change to PR with 58% but was denied by the government that had won its election under FPTP with 39% of votes and required 60%. PEI’s referendum voted 52% for MMP but had voter turnout too low to be accepted. Ontario’s 2007 referendum, due to poor preparation by the government, was a fiasco. 70% of Ontarians did not know what the referendum was about and only 10% understood the proposed MMP system.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Sharon Sommerville
>> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2018 1:13 PM
>> To: FVC Waterloo Region Discussion
>> Subject: [fvc-wat-disc] Invite Bob Hepburn to talk?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Would it be of interest to invite Bob Hepburn to discuss PR with Dennis Pilon or the journalist that wrote that supportive article in the Star?
>>
>>
>>
>> It would be interesting.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> S.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
>> Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>> Unsubscribe: http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
> Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
> Unsubscribe: http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.thinkers.org/pipermail/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org/attachments/20180618/c6778239/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the fvc-wat-disc
mailing list