<div dir="ltr">thanks, Jenn</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 3 April 2017 at 12:28, Jennifer Ross <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:2jennross@gmail.com" target="_blank">2jennross@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi Donald. He did mention this in the meeting. Yes, the Conservatives will vote for the ERRE result on account of the dreaded referendum bit. But, perhaps not every single one of them, therefore we need more than enough Liberals.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div><div class="h5"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Donald Fraser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:donaldafraser@gmail.com" target="_blank">donaldafraser@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I'm curious about Nathan's math:<div><font face="monospace, monospace"><br></font></div><div><font face="monospace, monospace">CPC 97 </font></div><div><font face="monospace, monospace">NDP 44</font></div><div><font face="monospace, monospace">G </font> 1<br></div><div>Bloc 10</div><div>Indep 1</div><div>-------------------</div><div>Sub Tot 153</div><div>-------------------</div><div>Lib 180</div><div>==========</div><div>Total 333 </div><div>==========</div><div>Majority 167</div><div><br></div><div>If he counts CPC WITH us (can this be true?)+G+Indep+Bloc, we need 14 Libs to get to 167 ... he must know how some MPs will vote to say we need exactly 20 Lib defectors</div><div><br></div></div><div class="m_9068376786244299202HOEnZb"><div class="m_9068376786244299202h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 3 April 2017 at 11:39, Donald Fraser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:donaldafraser@gmail.com" target="_blank">donaldafraser@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">It exactly agrees with my own assessment ... <div><br></div><div>Bardish is the prime example of a politician who is in politics to serve herself ... her only aim is to rise in the party ... she is passionate about NOTHING except this goal ... she could care less about the environment, healthcare, election reform, aboriginal issues etc ... she only mouths the Party talking points, praises the leadership and promotes her Liberal history</div></div><div class="m_9068376786244299202m_6928933632133004353HOEnZb"><div class="m_9068376786244299202m_6928933632133004353h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 1 April 2017 at 19:53, Dave Arthur <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:arthurd23@bell.net" target="_blank">arthurd23@bell.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">In today's Star, Chantal Hebert's column comments on Bardish.<br>
"His (Trudeau's) attitude has filtered down the Liberal benches. They are filled with rookies who won seats for the first time in 2015. One of them — Bardish Chagger — serves as the government’s house leader. She has perfected the art of delivering unhelpful answers with a smile."<br>
Does this sound familiar?<br>
With Nathan's plea to work on key Liberal MPs in advance of the vote in May, who among our local Liberal MPs could be brought onside.<br>
I'm thinking Bardish is not one. Is that an appropriate assessment?<br>
Dave A <br>
<br>
---<br>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.<br>
<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.avast.com/antiviru<wbr>s</a><br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list<br>
Post a message: <a href="mailto:fvc-wat-disc@listserv.thinkers.org" target="_blank">fvc-wat-disc@listserv.thinkers<wbr>.org</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://listserv.thinkers.org/m<wbr>ailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_l<wbr>istserv.thinkers.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list<br>
Post a message: <a href="mailto:fvc-wat-disc@listserv.thinkers.org" target="_blank">fvc-wat-disc@listserv.thinkers<wbr>.org</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://listserv.thinkers.org/m<wbr>ailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_l<wbr>istserv.thinkers.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br></div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">-- <br><div class="m_9068376786244299202gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:10px;background-color:transparent;font-style:normal"><span><font color="#888888"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:tahoma,new york,times,serif"><span style="line-height:10.909090995788574px">No other Western democratic country concentrates as much political power </span></span></font><font size="1"><span style="font-family:tahoma,new york,times,serif"><span style="line-height:10.909090995788574px">in the hands of one person as Canada does with her Prime Minister. </span></span></font></font></span></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</font></span></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list<br>
Post a message: <a href="mailto:fvc-wat-disc@listserv.thinkers.org">fvc-wat-disc@listserv.<wbr>thinkers.org</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://listserv.thinkers.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_<wbr>listserv.thinkers.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>