[fvc-wat-disc] Chantal's column reference to Bardish

[Donald Fraser]

thanks, Jenn

On 3 April 2017 at 12:28, Jennifer Ross <2jennross at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Donald.  He did mention this in the meeting.  Yes, the Conservatives
> will vote for the ERRE result on account of the dreaded referendum bit.
> But, perhaps not every single one of them, therefore we need more than
> enough Liberals.
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Donald Fraser <donaldafraser at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm curious about Nathan's math:
>>
>> CPC     97
>> NDP     44
>> G           1
>> Bloc        10
>> Indep        1
>> -------------------
>> Sub Tot  153
>> -------------------
>> Lib         180
>> ==========
>> Total       333
>> ==========
>> Majority   167
>>
>> If he counts CPC WITH us (can this be true?)+G+Indep+Bloc, we need 14
>> Libs to get to 167 ... he must know how some MPs will vote to say we need
>> exactly 20 Lib defectors
>>
>>
>> On 3 April 2017 at 11:39, Donald Fraser <donaldafraser at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It exactly agrees with my own assessment ...
>>>
>>> Bardish is the prime example of a politician who is in politics to serve
>>> herself ... her only aim is to rise in the party ... she is passionate
>>> about NOTHING except this goal ... she could care less about the
>>> environment, healthcare, election reform, aboriginal issues etc ... she
>>> only mouths the Party talking points, praises the leadership and promotes
>>> her Liberal history
>>>
>>> On 1 April 2017 at 19:53, Dave Arthur <arthurd23 at bell.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In today's Star, Chantal Hebert's column comments on Bardish.
>>>> "His (Trudeau's) attitude has filtered down the Liberal benches. They
>>>> are filled with rookies who won seats for the first time in 2015. One of
>>>> them — Bardish Chagger — serves as the government’s house leader. She has
>>>> perfected the art of delivering unhelpful answers with a smile."
>>>> Does this sound familiar?
>>>> With Nathan's plea to work on key Liberal MPs in advance of the vote in
>>>> May, who among our local Liberal MPs could be brought onside.
>>>> I'm thinking Bardish is not one. Is that an appropriate assessment?
>>>> Dave A
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
>>>> Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>>>> Unsubscribe: http://listserv.thinkers.org/m
>>>> ailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
>> Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>> Unsubscribe: http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_l
>> istserv.thinkers.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> No other Western democratic country concentrates as much political power in
> the hands of one person as Canada does with her Prime Minister.
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
> Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
> Unsubscribe: http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_
> listserv.thinkers.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.thinkers.org/pipermail/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org/attachments/20170403/6cbc34c3/attachment-0002.htm>