[fvc-wat-disc] Letters to the Editor Needed

Jon Bathmaker jon.bathmaker at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 17:49:26 EST 2017


Why do you think that Leadnow will not support having people sign the I 
won't vote etc. pledge?

Jon

On 2/3/2017 5:31 PM, Anita Nickerson wrote:
> What would be most effective is two things:
>
> a) having as many people sign an "I will not vote for you again 
> because you broke your electoral reform promise" pledge as signed the 
> vote together pledge
>
> b) media at his office embarrassing him with that as I outlined below, 
> so more and more people find out about it
>
> These kinds of partisan activities probably cannot be done by FVC is 
> the problem, Leadnow is not going to do it, and without the mailing 
> lists to do it, it is difficult. But not impossible.
>
> Anita
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Jon Bathmaker <jon.bathmaker at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jon.bathmaker at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     > I know this is not positive but the Liberals need to own this.
>     The only world that is positive all the time is the one inhabited
>     by Mary Poppins.   Since I don't live in that world I'm fine with it.
>
>     I remember Raj coming to a little gathering in a pub for the
>     Leadnow types who had helped him get elected. He was late but he
>     had clearly made a largish effort to get there and was very
>     grateful for the Leadnow crew's efforts on his behalf.   That
>     lasted about a week.
>
>     I think we should stop playing nice with these turds. I think we
>     should just visit Bardish and Bryan and Marwan and Raj and deal
>     the cards straight off the top of the deck.  OK Mr/Ms. MP, you
>     don't want to play with us anymore after we got you elected to
>     implement PR?  No problem, we're not going to get mad, we're going
>     get even by organizing like crazy and handing you your ass in 19
>     (Kiss the pension goodbye!)  Now go and tell *that* to Prime
>     Minister Pretty Boy.
>
>     Regards,
>     Jon
>
>     On 2/3/2017 4:24 PM, Anita Nickerson wrote:
>>     I would like to let you know that my Liberal tuque has arrived.
>>
>>     I am interested in a march to Raj Saini's office carrying a
>>     coffin symbolizing the Death of Liberal Promise on Electoral Reform.
>>
>>     It would have to be at a time when he is there so he can come out
>>     and explain why the Prime Minister now says that the promise he
>>     and every one of his MPs used to get elected is "wrong" and
>>     several other lies.
>>
>>     The best thing would be if some media were there, or we can send
>>     them pictures and quotes afterward.
>>
>>     I know this is not positive but the Liberals need to own this.
>>
>>     Every MP needs to own this and to know that nobody buys their
>>     lame excuses.
>>
>>     Every MP especially needs to know that their crass calculations
>>     on this one were wrong, and the very people who helped elect them
>>     may now help un-elect them.
>>
>>     I would also like to deliver Raj the tuke. I wouldn't want his
>>     ears to get cold.
>>
>>     Of course saner voices are welcome to propose more constructive
>>     action.
>>
>>     Anita
>>
>>     On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Donald Fraser
>>     <donaldafraser at gmail.com <mailto:donaldafraser at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         thanks, Cathe
>>
>>         On 3 February 2017 at 12:47, <cdcampbell9 at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:cdcampbell9 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Great letter, Don. It was clear and readable.
>>
>>             Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
>>
>>             *From: *Donald Fraser
>>             *Sent: *Friday, February 3, 2017 12:16 PM
>>             *To: *FVC Waterloo Region Discussion
>>             *Reply To: *FVC Waterloo Region Discussion
>>             *Subject: *Re: [fvc-wat-disc] Letters to the Editor Needed
>>
>>
>>
>>             I'll pick the negative one ... just love a scrap ... so
>>             here's my response
>>
>>             ======================================================
>>
>>             Dear Editor,
>>
>>
>>               Re:_The political fallout of breaking a promise_by
>>               Joanna Smith_Feb3_2017
>>
>>             Ms Smith asks, “But what of the majority of Canadians? Do
>>             they care? Does it matter?” in reference to Electoral
>>             Reform (ER).
>>
>>             It matters. In our system of First Past the Post (FPTP),
>>             votes cast for a Green candidate, for example, who loses
>>             are useless. The Planet-caring, environmentally
>>             conscious, politically aware voters in the particular
>>             riding have no say in Ottawa. A certain percentage of all
>>             Canadians want Green objectives to be part of the laws of
>>             Canada.
>>
>>             It matters because these environmentalists should have
>>             their say in the structure of government. In a
>>             proportional system, for instance, every vote counts to
>>             obtain the same percentage of seats for a party as the
>>             party received in the national vote count.
>>
>>             It matters because they may not vote in the next
>>             election, knowing that their votes won’t count.
>>
>>             I matters because, due to discouragement, they may cease
>>             to engage in the political discussion and the environment
>>             will suffer for it.
>>
>>             Later Smith states, “Then there is a much larger group
>>             that knows little and cares less about ER” in reference
>>             to the Canadian electorate at large.
>>
>>             “… knows little and cares less … “ is simply cause and
>>             effect. Unfortunately, it is difficult to excite the
>>             electorate about ER possibilities when they “know
>>             little”. Attempts to educate the public about ER are
>>             generally regarded as “election activity” which annoys
>>             citizens between elections. To be fair there is a small
>>             percentage which does respond with enthusiasm.
>>
>>             New Zealand (NZ) solved the problem by having a trial run
>>             at Mixed Member PR (MMPR) for four terms. The electorate
>>             was educated by experience and when consulted after the
>>             trial, voted for MMPR over the former FPTP system. Their
>>             experience demonstrates that an educated public will
>>             choose a proportional alternative to our antiquated and
>>             unfair FPTP which wastes the votes of any citizen whose
>>             local candidate did not win in their riding.
>>
>>             Germany has practiced MMPR since WW2. The resulting
>>             stable form of coalition government has allowed Germans
>>             to become the master long term planners we recognize them
>>             for. They avoid the 'Policy Pendulum' in which false
>>             majority governments cancel, at great expense to the
>>             taxpayer, the projects of the preceding government.
>>             Rather each new government improves and supports policies
>>             of the previous government.
>>
>>             Yours Truly,
>>
>>             Donald A Fraser,
>>
>>             184 Forsyth Drive,
>>
>>             Waterloo, Ontario,
>>
>>             N2L-1A2
>>
>>             519-576-9210 <tel:%28519%29%20576-9210>
>>
>>
>>             On 2 February 2017 at 23:02, Sharon Sommerville
>>             <sharonsommerville at gmail.com
>>             <mailto:sharonsommerville at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Hello FairVoting Friends,
>>
>>                 Two great articles in today's Record for us to
>>                 respond to:
>>
>>                 http://www.therecord.com/news-story/7100196-the-political-fallout-of-breaking-a-promise/
>>
>>                 http://www.therecord.com/opinion-story/7098054-d-amato-broken-promise-may-haunt-liberals/
>>
>>                 We should capitalize on these articles with letters
>>                 to the editor. A couple of letters in response to
>>                 each letter would be wonderful.  Any number would be
>>                 great.
>>                 Have sent the request out to our larger discussion
>>                 list as some new names would be helpful!
>>
>>                 Let me know if you can take either of these on.
>>
>>                 With thanks,
>>                 Sharon
>>
>>
>>
>>                 _______________________________________________
>>                 This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
>>                 Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>>                 <mailto:fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org>
>>                 Unsubscribe:
>>                 http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
>>                 <http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
>>             Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>>             <mailto:fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org>
>>             Unsubscribe:
>>             http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
>>             <http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
>>             Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>>             <mailto:fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org>
>>             Unsubscribe:
>>             http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
>>             <http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
>>         Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>>         <mailto:fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org>
>>         Unsubscribe:
>>         http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
>>         <http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
>>     Post a message:fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>>     <mailto:fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org>
>>     Unsubscribe:http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
>>     <http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org>
>     _______________________________________________ This is the
>     fvc-wat-disc mailing list Post a message:
>     fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
>     <mailto:fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org> Unsubscribe:
>     http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
>     <http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the fvc-wat-disc mailing list
> Post a message: fvc-wat-disc at listserv.thinkers.org
> Unsubscribe: http://listserv.thinkers.org/mailman/listinfo/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.thinkers.org/pipermail/fvc-wat-disc_listserv.thinkers.org/attachments/20170203/35b4890c/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the fvc-wat-disc mailing list